Post by Corinne Kaplan on Dec 4, 2010 14:42:30 GMT -5
Well, this vote ended up a little harder than I expected. Yau-Man gave up any chance at giving a single vote with his comments, poor play Yau.
Sandra, in true Sandra style, really made up for her gameplay with her comments. She unapologetically defended her strictly-business gameplay, while the others played politics and tried to cover up their lack of social game.
Yet I can't overlook Shane's gameplay. People are critical because he didn't make big moves, but why make them if you don't have to? He played as much as was necessary at every point in the game to get by. He dominated the ICs after the merge. He smartly kept jurors on his side rather than betraying everyone just to rack up a "power move".
Shane, my vote is for you. Well done, and I hope you use the money to take a better head shot, because damn...Congrats!
Sandra, in true Sandra style, really made up for her gameplay with her comments. She unapologetically defended her strictly-business gameplay, while the others played politics and tried to cover up their lack of social game.
Yet I can't overlook Shane's gameplay. People are critical because he didn't make big moves, but why make them if you don't have to? He played as much as was necessary at every point in the game to get by. He dominated the ICs after the merge. He smartly kept jurors on his side rather than betraying everyone just to rack up a "power move".
Shane, my vote is for you. Well done, and I hope you use the money to take a better head shot, because damn...Congrats!
